On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 09:48:43AM +0000, Patrick DELAUNAY wrote: > Hi Maxime and Tom > > > > > I think I need to cross-check my initial requirements on my side for the > > boot > > from NAND scenario (because the project to will use SPL but also a other > > primary bootloader) > > > > Since the beginning the GPT was a strong request to have common behavior > > fot block device and MTD device but after it seens too difficult to guaranty > > boot with NAND constraint. > > > > With your feedback, I will try to drop this requirement.... > > I will check this point internally and to push to switch to UBIFS. > > > > Thanks for the remarks, > > But finally I will drop this patchset, as I convinced my project to no don't > use GPT for NOR and NAND devices after Maxime remarks. > > Tom: what is the better way to drop all the patchset (with patman or with > patchwork) > > Change state to rejected with patchwork ?
I moved them to deferred or rejected, I forget which, yes. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
