On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 2:50 AM, Jonathan Gray <j...@jsg.id.au> wrote:
> Comment was intended to be mx6d/mx6q?
>
> Though the test here may not be needed as setup_sata() returns early if
> not available. And mx6cuboxi.c wouldn't need to be updated here if a
> i.MX 6DualPlus or i.MX 6QuadPlus board from SolidRun shows up at some
> point in the future.
>
> u-boot/arch/arm/imx-common/sata.c
>
> int setup_sata(void)
> {
> struct iomuxc *const iomuxc_regs = (struct iomuxc *)IOMUXC_BASE_ADDR;
> int ret;
>
> if (!is_mx6dq() && !is_mx6dqp())
> return 1;
Good points!
Peter, please send a v2 taking into account Jonathan's comments. Thanks
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
