On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Jorge Ramirez <jorge.ramirez-or...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 05/10/2017 06:33 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 11:33:35AM +0200, Jorge Ramirez wrote: >>>> >>>> On 05/10/2017 04:30 AM, Tom Rini wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> hey Tom, I am not sure how to move this forward really so let me >>>>>> clarify where I think we stand: >>>>>> >>>>>> 1. The linux kernel does not need the clock property in the uart >>>>>> nodes (only u-boot does: serial_pl01x.c needs fixing). >>>>>> 2. ehci is not present in the linux kernel poplar dts yet but it >>>>>> will be eventually. >>>>>> >>>>>> with this in mind, what is blocking the acceptance of the patchset? >>>>>> >>>>>> I can do v5 using the linux kernel dts as is and creating a >>>>>> hi3798cv200-u-boot.dtsi that simply adds the nodes above (this time >>>>>> no #include required:) ) >>>>>> >>>>>> Then when ehci is added to the kernel, the ehci node can be removed >>>>> >>>>> >from u-boot.dtsi >>>>>> >>>>>> And when uboot updates its pl01x.c serial driver, the uart0 node >>>>>> can be removed and the u-boot.dtsi filed completely deleted. >>>>> >>>>> Can you take a stab at updating the pl01x driver? Thanks! >>>> >>>> updating pl01x is not a big deal I dont think; however this will >>>> mean requiring a platform specific clock driver to just use the >>>> pl01x - which will take me some time to get into uboot for my >>>> platform (and the same might happen to other users). >>> >>> Ah right. So the flip side here, is one not allowed to have the clock >>> property anymore? Yes, it may not be used in the kernel, but has >>> someone argued that it's not part of the hardware description? >> >> First I've ever seen a "clock" property. We have "clocks" from the >> clock binding which is a phandle plus #clock-cells number of args. We >> also have "clock-frequency" which is just the frequency value and has >> been around forever. Why u-boot went off and did something different i >> don't know. Sigh. What I can say is a 3rd way is not going to be >> accepted. >> >> Generally, the clock binding replaces clock-frequency, but there are >> some cases where clock binding would be overkill or too complicated >> for early boot and using clock-frequency would be okay. > > > agreed > >> But I don't >> think "I haven't written my platform clock controller driver yet" is a >> reason to use clock-frequency as generally most platforms are going to >> have to have one. Providing a stub driver that just returns a fixed >> frequency shouldn't be too hard IMO. > > > I also agree but please do notice that this was not quite what I was saying. > what I am saying is that writing a stub driver to only provide a single UART > clock rate and nothing else is also an overkill (this platform has no need > for other clocks in u-boot)
Sorry, I find that hard to believe. There's no SD card, display, SPI, I2C? Those all need clocks at some point. > Incidentally the value that I need to retrieve is itself hard-coded in an > array in the kernel source code and set up via clk_register_fixed_rate > instead of using a fixed-clock node in the device tree. > So there is not much value that I can see in providing such a stub driver > really... If you don't need clock properties in Linux, then you shouldn't need them in u-boot either. But that's not what I see in the dts under review: + uart0: serial@8b00000 { + compatible = "arm,pl011", "arm,primecell"; + reg = <0x8b00000 0x1000>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 49 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; + clocks = <&sysctrl HISTB_UART0_CLK>; + clock-names = "apb_pclk"; + status = "disabled"; + }; + + uart2: serial@8b02000 { + compatible = "arm,pl011", "arm,primecell"; + reg = <0x8b02000 0x1000>; + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 51 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; + clocks = <&crg HISTB_UART2_CLK>; + clock-names = "apb_pclk"; + status = "disabled"; + }; + Which BTW is also wrong as a single clock is deprecated. There should be 2 clocks. Rob _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot