On Wednesday 10 May 2017 04:56 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 04:44:45PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >> >> >> On Wednesday 10 May 2017 04:27 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >>> Enable time command for OMAP-L138 LCDK board. >>> >>> The patch was generated using savedefconfig >>> method. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsek...@ti.com> >> >> Instead of enabling each command like this, I was about to ask to >> include TI_COMMON_CMD_OPTIONS( defined inside board/ti/common/Kconfig) >> for omapl138. Realized that omapl138 is under "board/davinci/" and >> cannot include board/ti/common/Kconfig directly. May be I am missing >> some history here, why can't all davinci boards be under board/ti? > > History is the answer here, yes. But is there really a reason davinci > couldn't source board/ti/common/Kconfig ? >
Nothing. Can be sourced easily just that it appears like a Kconfig from a different vendor is being included. Then instead of this patch, ti/common Kconfig should be included and enable TI_COMMON_CMD_OPTIONS for omapl138. Thanks and regards, Lokesh _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot