Wolfgang Denk a écrit : > Dear Albert ARIBAUD, > > In message <4aec53db.6050...@free.fr> you wrote: >> Would a name such as "marvell.h" be more acceptable? This would be > > Hm... I expect there will be little chance to see MAarvell IP blocks > in non-Marvell SoCs, so this should work indeed. On the other hand, > why not chose a name that works for other CPUs / SoCs as well. [So on > second thought maybe your "soc.h" was not that bad a name.] > > Let's see what others suggest.
While we wait for others' opinion, one quick question: do you prefer me to submit this rework of the Marvell IP/drivers as individual patches, one for each IP/driver, or as a single patch for the whole rework? Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
