On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 05:10:33AM +1200, Chris Packham wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> 
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote:
> > This converts the following to Kconfig:
> >    CONFIG_CMD_AES
> >    CONFIG_AES
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
> > ---
> >
> >  cmd/Kconfig                   |  9 +++++++++
> >  configs/seaboard_defconfig    |  1 +
> >  include/configs/amcore.h      |  1 -
> >  include/configs/seaboard.h    |  1 -
> >  include/configs/topic_miami.h |  1 -
> >  lib/Kconfig                   | 13 +++++++++++++
> >  scripts/config_whitelist.txt  |  2 --
> >  7 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/cmd/Kconfig b/cmd/Kconfig
> > index 13dc46a174..a78519297c 100644
> > --- a/cmd/Kconfig
> > +++ b/cmd/Kconfig
> > @@ -769,6 +769,15 @@ config CMD_REGULATOR
> >  endmenu
> >
> >  menu "Security commands"
> > +config CMD_AES
> > +       bool "Enable the 'aes' command"
> 
> Should this select AES or depend on it? I wondered the same thing
> about my CMD_DATE and RTC?

In this case, likely yes.  In the case of date, I think we need a little
more Kconfig symbols to be able to do that, so for now, it's probably
not worth it.  Once everything is in DM however, then, yes.

-- 
Tom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to