On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 05:10:33AM +1200, Chris Packham wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > > This converts the following to Kconfig: > > CONFIG_CMD_AES > > CONFIG_AES > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > --- > > > > cmd/Kconfig | 9 +++++++++ > > configs/seaboard_defconfig | 1 + > > include/configs/amcore.h | 1 - > > include/configs/seaboard.h | 1 - > > include/configs/topic_miami.h | 1 - > > lib/Kconfig | 13 +++++++++++++ > > scripts/config_whitelist.txt | 2 -- > > 7 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/cmd/Kconfig b/cmd/Kconfig > > index 13dc46a174..a78519297c 100644 > > --- a/cmd/Kconfig > > +++ b/cmd/Kconfig > > @@ -769,6 +769,15 @@ config CMD_REGULATOR > > endmenu > > > > menu "Security commands" > > +config CMD_AES > > + bool "Enable the 'aes' command" > > Should this select AES or depend on it? I wondered the same thing > about my CMD_DATE and RTC?
In this case, likely yes. In the case of date, I think we need a little more Kconfig symbols to be able to do that, so for now, it's probably not worth it. Once everything is in DM however, then, yes. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
