On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 12:20:46PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvu...@ti.com>
> ---
> board/ti/am335x/board.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/board/ti/am335x/board.c b/board/ti/am335x/board.c
> index 3e842d3187..566183e669 100644
> --- a/board/ti/am335x/board.c
> +++ b/board/ti/am335x/board.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <common.h>
> +#include <dm.h>
> #include <errno.h>
> #include <spl.h>
> #include <serial.h>
> @@ -26,6 +27,7 @@
> #include <asm/emif.h>
> #include <asm/gpio.h>
> #include <asm/omap_sec_common.h>
> +#include <asm/omap_mmc.h>
> #include <i2c.h>
> #include <miiphy.h>
> #include <cpsw.h>
> @@ -892,3 +894,33 @@ void board_fit_image_post_process(void **p_image, size_t
> *p_size)
> secure_boot_verify_image(p_image, p_size);
> }
> #endif
> +
> +#if !CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(OF_CONTROL)
> +static const struct omap_hsmmc_plat am335x_mmc0_platdata = {
> + .base_addr = (struct hsmmc *)0x48060000,OK. So, off the top of my head, from Adam's series about converting omap3, OMAP_HSMMC1_BASE and company aren't defined correctly? Or we're playing games with that 0x100 offset? I bring this up as since we have defines for these base addresses already, we should make use of them, but in this case first we'll have to do... something, yes? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
