Remy Bohmer wrote: > Hi, > > 2009/10/29 Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de>: >> Hi Remy, >> >> On Wednesday 28 October 2009 22:13:38 Remy Bohmer wrote: >>> The current generic code for handling unaligned access assumes that >>> the processor can properly handle unaligned accesses itself. >>> This is at least not the case for ARM, which results in runtime >>> errors. >>> >>> Rewrite it such that it works for ARM as well. >> I introduced this header some time ago for UBIFS support (for PowerPC). >> As you may have noticed, it's a copy from the Linux version. And I > > Yep, I noticed that. > >> would like to keep it this way if possible. > > I understand that, but still the code in there is not _generic_, it > might work on Linux since the data-abort trapcode is handling this > exception that occurs on unaligned accesses... > >> Looking at the Linux ARM >> version, the basic difference seems to be the header >> "include/asm-arm/unaligned.h" which includes this file. The Linux >> version of "unaligned.h" does *not* include "access_ok.h" at all. It >> includes "le_byteshift.h" and "be_byteshift.h" instead. And I would >> really like to keep this in sync with Linux if possible. > >> So why not do it this way (totally untested):
I see the patch has been reposted. Has it been tested ? Tom _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
