Hi Simon,

On 26.03.2017 05:52, Simon Glass wrote:
On 20 March 2017 at 05:51, Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de> wrote:
Add a test for the correct device removal. Currently two different ways
for device removal are supported:

- Normal device removal via the device_remove() API
- Removal via selective device driver flags (DM_FLAG_ACTIVE_DMA)

This new test "remove_active_dma" adds tests cases for those both ways
of removal.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de>
Cc: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
---
v2:
- New patch in patchset

 test/dm/core.c        | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 test/dm/test-driver.c |  1 +
 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+)

diff --git a/test/dm/core.c b/test/dm/core.c
index 07b2419ea4..ef85e6b79c 100644
--- a/test/dm/core.c
+++ b/test/dm/core.c
@@ -656,6 +656,47 @@ static int dm_test_pre_reloc(struct unit_test_state *uts)
 }
 DM_TEST(dm_test_pre_reloc, 0);

+/*
+ * Test that removal of devices, either via the "normal" device_remove()
+ * API or via the device driver selective flag works as expected
+ */
+static int dm_test_remove_active_dma(struct unit_test_state *uts)
+{
+       struct dm_test_state *dms = uts->priv;
+       struct udevice *dev;
+
+       ut_assertok(device_bind_by_name(dms->root, false, &driver_info_manual,
+                                       &dev));
+       ut_assert(dev);
+
+       /* Probe the device */
+       ut_assertok(device_probe(dev));
+
+       /* Test if device is active right now */
+       ut_asserteq(true, device_active(dev));
+
+       /* Remove the device via selective remove flag */
+       dm_remove_devices_flags(DM_REMOVE_ACTIVE_ALL);
+
+       /* Test if device is inactive right now */
+       ut_asserteq(false, device_active(dev));
+
+       /* Probe the device again */
+       ut_assertok(device_probe(dev));
+
+       /* Test if device is active right now */
+       ut_asserteq(true, device_active(dev));
+
+       /* Remove the device via "normal" remove API */
+       ut_assertok(device_remove(dev, DM_REMOVE_NORMAL));

This doesn't actually test a device not getting removed (due to its
flag) I think. Can you add a test for that?

Yes, I forgot to add a test for this "non-removal case". Will add
in the next version.

Thanks,
Stefan
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to