On 02/10/2017 02:00 AM, Thomas Schaefer wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 05:51:36PM +0000, york sun wrote: >>> On 02/09/2017 09:46 AM, Thomas Schaefer wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 02/09/2017 02:32 AM, Thomas Schaefer wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi York,
<snip> > > I've built u-boot for T1042RDB with and without the above patch applied. > Actually, binary images > created are the same (with the exception of build timestamp of course), so > GCC actually removes > the unused variables. > > When adding __maybe_unsued attribute to the variable definitions, warnings > don't show up anymore: > > diff --git a/drivers/ddr/fsl/options.c b/drivers/ddr/fsl/options.c > index d6a8fcb216..64aaa77047 100644 > --- a/drivers/ddr/fsl/options.c > +++ b/drivers/ddr/fsl/options.c Thomas, Can you put your patch together with proper commit message and signature? I prefer your solution than this one http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/726353/ York _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot