Currently, AM43xx just re-uses the version strings from AM33xx which is
wrong; the actual values for AM43xx are different. Fix this by adding
a separate version string array for AM43xx and use this instead.
Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kri...@ti.com>
Reported-by: Sekhar Nori <nsek...@ti.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/am33xx/sys_info.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/am33xx/sys_info.c
b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/am33xx/sys_info.c
index f0f72fa..e4fc461 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/am33xx/sys_info.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/am33xx/sys_info.c
@@ -74,6 +74,10 @@ static char *cpu_revs[] = {
"2.0",
"2.1"};
+static char *cpu_revs_am43xx[] = {
+ "1.0",
+ "1.1",
+ "1.2"};
static char *dev_types[] = {
"TST",
@@ -87,6 +91,7 @@ static char *dev_types[] = {
int print_cpuinfo(void)
{
char *cpu_s, *sec_s, *rev_s;
+ char **cpu_rev_arr = cpu_revs;
switch (get_cpu_type()) {
case AM335X:
@@ -97,6 +102,7 @@ int print_cpuinfo(void)
break;
case AM437X:
cpu_s = "AM437X";
+ cpu_rev_arr = cpu_revs_am43xx;
break;
default:
cpu_s = "Unknown CPU type";
@@ -104,7 +110,7 @@ int print_cpuinfo(void)
}
if (get_cpu_rev() < ARRAY_SIZE(cpu_revs))
- rev_s = cpu_revs[get_cpu_rev()];
+ rev_s = cpu_rev_arr[get_cpu_rev()];
else
rev_s = "?";
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
