On 02/20/2017 06:35 PM, Moritz Fischer wrote: > Hi all, > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 6:59 AM, Michal Simek <michal.si...@xilinx.com> wrote: > >> Definitely I am open to improve this subsystem to make it more flexible. > > Over at linux-fpga ([1]) we're currently discussing the idea of coming > up with a header > format (vendor neutral) that we stitch onto the fpga image to allow the > fpga-mgr > to derive certain features of the image from the image itself (i.e. is > the image encrypted, > compressed, ...).
Can you CC me on that discussion ? I think it'd be for the best to use DT for the header format, it's documented and vendor-neutral already. > We're trying to come up with an extensible format that would allow us > to add stuff like > encryption keys etc. Nothing like a NIH format :) > Cheers, > > Moritz > > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9574399/ > -- Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
