On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 09:45:26AM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote: > > > On Thursday 09 February 2017 02:02 AM, Andrew F. Davis wrote: > > The non-HS defconfig has been modified without equivalent changes being > > applied to the HS defconfig. Sync these here. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <a...@ti.com> > > Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvu...@ti.com> > > I am sure we might encounter this problem again after some time :(
Well, the good news is I think we can do something about this soon now.
In the kernel we now have:
commit 237e3ad0f195d8fd34f1299e45f04793832a16fc
Author: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pi...@linaro.org>
Date: Fri Nov 11 00:10:05 2016 -0500
Kconfig: Introduce the "imply" keyword
And cherry-picking this, and maybe the preceding commit will let us move
lots of these logic into arch/arm/Kconfig where we can imply lots of
features that an SoC has but still allow them to be turned off.
--
Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
