Hi Tom, On 02/05/2017 07:56 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 03:37:02PM -0600, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > >> This patch seires adds nand uclass driver and enables omap_gpmc to >> adopt driver model. This has been tested on AM335x GP EVM and >> AM437x GP EVM. >> >> As preparation for introducing nand uclass driver the new API >> get_nand_dev_by_index() was added to avoid direct acces to nand_info array >> and >> u-boot core files were updated to use it. >> >> Patches can be found at: >> g...@git.ti.com:~gragst/ti-u-boot/gragsts-ti-u-boot.git dm-nand-v2 > > My conceptual concern here is that we need to address (as I've stated > elsewhere) the need to get DM/DT support within SPL on these families > (and yes, figure out what we'll do with respect to HS and the further > size constraints) before we push farther down this path of DM/DT > conversion as it's adding more #if/#else/#endif code that we need to be > able to drop. Thanks! >
I understand your concern and see it's discussed now in [1], but I'd like to understand how to proceed with this series. The original patches from from Mugunthan are at about 1 year old and and it took me pretty a lot of time to just re-base them properly, so will it be acceptable if i will re-send only patches 1-10 as they are do not depend on TI SPL and will unblock DM conversation of other drivers? Really want to reduce existed patch queue :( [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg237938.html -- regards, -grygorii _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
