Hi Joakim, On 15 January 2017 at 09:49, Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernl...@infinera.com> wrote: > On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 10:06 -0700, Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi Joakim, >> >> On 14 January 2017 at 04:51, Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > +Simon, >> > >> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 4:12 AM, Joakim Tjernlund >> > <joakim.tjernl...@infinera.com> wrote: >> > > I found two repos w.r.t x86_64 for u-boot, which one should I use? >> > > >> > >> > U-Boot x86_64 support is not in mainstream yet. >> >> I'll be sending v3 fairly soon. But even then it is not complete. >> Various things need fixing up and polishing - e.g. SDRAM sizing, >> graphics ROMs, actually booting Linux! > > Great, getting closer every day. > Any idea for how much is missing in u-boot to bring up a > Rangeley(C2758), no graphics required. Need networking, rs232, USB and maybe > SATA.
If it uses an FSP then it probably isn't much work to get it running with 32-bit U-Boot. Bin is the expert here. For 64-bit, we have quite a few things to do. But note that 32-bit U-Boot can directly boot both 32-bit and 64-bit kernels. It does not have the 'UEFI' restriction of having to select your boot loader based on your kernel. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
