> > I'm a little confused :-) > > I realized when I was trying to apply this patch that this is already > part of the u-boot-ti and u-boot-arm trees. > > > > I am referring to > > http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot- > ti.git;a=commitdiff;h=4eb3af078267e103fb957cb831497cf7670fb3f4 > > > > The patch in this e-mail chain was supposed to fix a bug discovered > after Tom updated his tree. > > > > Since this patch was already part of u-boot-ti and u-boot-arm trees, I > don't see how this fixes a bug. > > It's easy ;) > > The applied patch has a bug that the chip detection is done too late. > It has to be done some lines earlier: > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-October/062150.html > > (which is against the patch already applied). > > So there are two options to deal with this: > > a) Apply > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-October/062150.html > > on top of the patch already in u-boot-ti (and u-boot-arm) > > or > > b) Revert > > http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot- > ti.git;a=commitdiff;h=4eb3af078267e103fb957cb831497cf7670fb3f4 > > and apply > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-October/062153.html > > instead which has the "make the chip detection earlier" fix from (a) > above incorporated. > > Best regards > > Dirk
I have been enlightened :-) I have pushed this to u-boot-ti next http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-ti.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next Thanks, Sandeep _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
