Hi Jagan, On 21 December 2016 11:21, Jagan Teki wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Phil Edworthy > <phil.edwor...@renesas.com> wrote: > > On 21 December 2016 11:10, Jagan Teki wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Phil Edworthy > >> <phil.edwor...@renesas.com> wrote: > >> > The n25q128 devices support 4K erase. > >> > >> It's OK, but go with 64K erase. > > Sorry, I don’t understand your comment. > > Do you mean we should stick with 64K erase? > > If so, then what about all the other Micron devices that have SECT_4K? > > It's because we have tested 64K on these parts and it's fine why can't > we move 4K because 64K look faster, did you find any issue with 64K on > this specific part? No, I didn’t find any problems with it at 64K erase. As you say, erasing 64K is much faster than 16 x 4K erase. So should we move the other Micron parts to 64K?
Thanks Phil _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
