On Thursday 08 October 2009 07:29:51 Alessandro Rubini wrote: > Similarly, I'm not interested in "4 bytes at a time, then 1 at a time" > as it's quite a corner case. If such optimizations are really useful, > then we'd better have hand-crafted assembly for each arch, possibly > lifted from glibc.
why ? it's trivial to implement with little code impact. have your code run while the len is larger than 4 (sizeof-whatever), then fall through to the loop that runs while the len is larger than 0 instead of immediately returning. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
