On 11.11.2016 18:33, Tom Rini wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 06:32:15PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: >> Hi, >> >> 2016-11-11 17:04 GMT+01:00 Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com>: >> >>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 01:26:05PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote: >>> >>>> DTC 1.2 reports these warnings: >>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /memory has a reg or ranges >>>> property, but no unit name >>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /pmu has a reg or ranges property, >>>> but no unit name >>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /fixedregulator@0 has a unit name, >>>> but no reg property >>>> >>>> This patch is fixing them. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.si...@xilinx.com> >>> >>> Have you addressed these in Linux as well? >> >> Going to do so next week. >> Both should be in sync. > > Agreed. I'd prefer to pull them in via Linux but at least once they're > on their way into the right tree for upstream we can bring them in here > as well (as I want to ensure future re-syncs are easy). Thanks! >
I have sent them to Linux too. http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-November/467965.html http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-November/467967.html http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-November/467968.html For our case we have more dtses in u-boot especially for arm64 than in Linux. Also u-boot,dm-pre-reloc AFAIK hasn't been validated via dt mailing list. I see one thread in 2015 without any resolution. That's why taking stuff from Linux is sort of goal but nothing what we can do without additional work. Thanks, Michal -- Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91 w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854 Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Microblaze Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM and ZynqMP ARM64 SoCs U-Boot custodian - Xilinx Microblaze/Zynq/ZynqMP SoCs
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot