Hey Simon,

On 11-11-16 17:18, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Olliver, (is it one l or two?)

On 8 November 2016 at 08:54, Olliver Schinagl <oli...@schinagl.nl> wrote:
This patch adds a little tool that takes a generic MAC address and
generates a CRC byte for it. The output is the full MAC address without
any separators, ready written into an EEPROM.

Signed-off-by: Olliver Schinagl <o.schin...@ultimaker.com>
---
  tools/.gitignore        |  1 +
  tools/Makefile          |  4 ++++
  tools/gen_ethaddr_crc.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  3 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 tools/gen_ethaddr_crc.c

diff --git a/tools/.gitignore b/tools/.gitignore
index cb1e722..0d1f076 100644
--- a/tools/.gitignore
+++ b/tools/.gitignore
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
  /fit_check_sign
  /fit_info
  /gen_eth_addr
+/gen_ethaddr_crc
  /ifdtool
  /img2srec
  /kwboot
diff --git a/tools/Makefile b/tools/Makefile
index 06afdb0..4879ded 100644
--- a/tools/Makefile
+++ b/tools/Makefile
@@ -43,6 +43,10 @@ envcrc-objs := envcrc.o lib/crc32.o common/env_embedded.o 
lib/sha1.o
  hostprogs-$(CONFIG_CMD_NET) += gen_eth_addr
  HOSTCFLAGS_gen_eth_addr.o := -pedantic

+hostprogs-$(CONFIG_CMD_NET) += gen_ethaddr_crc
+gen_ethaddr_crc-objs := gen_ethaddr_crc.o lib/crc8.o
+HOSTCFLAGS_gen_ethaddr_crc.o := -pedantic
+
  hostprogs-$(CONFIG_CMD_LOADS) += img2srec
  HOSTCFLAGS_img2srec.o := -pedantic

diff --git a/tools/gen_ethaddr_crc.c b/tools/gen_ethaddr_crc.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9b5bdb0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/gen_ethaddr_crc.c
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+/*
+ * (C) Copyright 2016
+ * Olliver Schinagl <oli...@schinagl.nl>
+ *
+ * SPDX-License-Identifier:    GPL-2.0+
+ */
+
+#include <ctype.h>
+#include <stdint.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <u-boot/crc.h>
+
+#define ARP_HLEN 6 /* Length of hardware address */
Is there no #define for this in standard headers?

+
+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+       uint_fast8_t i;
+       uint8_t mac_addr[ARP_HLEN + 1] = { 0x00 };
Why do you need to init it?
Because I did it in the net stuff as well, where I used the 'is_zero_mac()'' to indicate things where not setup properly. I guess it can go here ...

+
+       if (argc < 2) {
+               puts("Please supply a MAC address.");
How about a usage() function which gives generic help as well?
fair point, You caught me on being lazy :) I didn't think of it for such a simple tool. I'll put it in the next version.

+               return -1;
+       }
+
+       if (!((strlen(argv[1]) == 12) || (strlen(argv[1]) == 17))) {
+               puts("Please supply a valid MAC address with optionaly\n"
optionally. But do you mean 'Please supply a valid MAC address with
optional - or : separators?'

+                    "dashes (-) or colons (:) as seperators.");
separators.

+               return -1;
+       }
+
+       i = 0;
+       while (*argv[1] != '\0') {
How about putting this code in a separate function:

int process_mac(const char *max)

so you don't have to access argv[1] all the time. Also you can return
1 instead of -1 from main() on error.
right, no prob.

+               char nibble[2] = { 0x00, '\n' }; /* for strtol */
+
+               nibble[0] = *argv[1]++;
+               if (isxdigit(nibble[0])) {
+                       if (isupper(nibble[0]))
+                               nibble[0] = tolower(nibble[0]);
+                       mac_addr[i >> 1] |= strtol(nibble, NULL, 16) << ((i % 2) ? 
0 : 4) & ((i % 2) ? 0x0f : 0xf0);
How about a nibble_to_hex() function here? This is strange-looking
code. I'm wondering what you are trying to do.
It is strange, and we even have a nice function in u-boot I belive, but it's a pain to get to add it to this, hence the manual way. I'll add some doc to the func as well.

+                       i++;
+               }
+       }
+       mac_addr[ARP_HLEN] = crc8(0, mac_addr, ARP_HLEN);
I suggest putting this in a separate variable...

+
+       for (i = 0; i < ARP_HLEN + 1; i++)
+               printf("%.2x", mac_addr[i]);
+       putchar('\n');
and here: printf("%.2x\n", crc)
yeah i do like the separate var for here.

+
+       return 0;
+}
--
2.10.2

Regards,
Simon

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to