On 21.7.2016 16:46, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 01:51:20PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote: >> Hi Tom, >> >> On 19.7.2016 07:12, Siva Durga Prasad Paladugu wrote: >>> Move config option CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH as Kconfig >>> option. All the boards which needs to enable this >>> option can be done through defconfigs >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Siva Durga Prasad Paladugu <siva...@xilinx.com> >>> --- >>> Changes for v2: >>> - No changes >>> --- >>> common/Kconfig | 6 ++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/common/Kconfig b/common/Kconfig >>> index 8adc821..46e7173 100644 >>> --- a/common/Kconfig >>> +++ b/common/Kconfig >>> @@ -197,3 +197,9 @@ config CONSOLE_RECORD_IN_SIZE >>> tstc() and getc() will use this in preference to real device input. >>> The buffer is allocated immediately after the malloc() region is >>> ready. >>> + >>> +config SYS_NO_FLASH >>> + bool "Disable support for parallel NOR flash" >>> + default n >>> + help >>> + This option is used to disable support for parallel NOR flash. >>> >> >> Do you want to take this patch to your tree? >> Or should I take it to my tree with others patches which remove this >> option for zynq boards? > > Is it blocking other changes? If no, I'll grab it probably post -rc2 > and migrate all config files, if yes, um, if we can grab this now and > migrate later without adding a ton of warnings, we can go that way.
There are 2 follow up patches which depends on this one. http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2016-July/260970.html http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2016-July/260972.html The point here that they are removing board files for 4 boards. But if you want to do it after rc2 I am fine with it. Thanks, Michal _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
