On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 04:15:47AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > > kind of a style question but what is the preferred way to define a > > board in the sense of what belongs in the defconfig file and what > > belongs in the header file? > > The header files will eventually go away. Most of the contents are > things that could be, but haven't yet been, converted. A few things > like default environment are going to be harder to figure out.
and what about the advantage of header files that allow the inclusion of other header files to reduce duplication? will config files be extended to allow the same thing? (they don't do that now, do they?) rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday ======================================================================== _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot