Hi Jeremy,
On 11 July 2016 at 16:55, Jeremy Hunt <jeremy.h...@deshawresearch.com> wrote:
> As part of the startup process for boards using the SPL, the
> meaning of board_init_f changed such that it should return normally
> rather than calling board_init_r directly.
> (see db910353a126d84fe8dff7a694ea792f50fcfb6a)
> This was fixed in 32-bit arm, but broke when SPL was added to
> 64 bit arm. This fixes crt0_64 so that it calls board_init_r
> durring the SPL and removes the direct call from board_init_f
> from the arm SPL example.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Hunt <jeremy.h...@deshawresearch.com>
>
> ---
>
> arch/arm/lib/crt0_64.S | 3 +--
> arch/arm/lib/spl.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/crt0_64.S b/arch/arm/lib/crt0_64.S
> index cad22c7..91b19e0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/lib/crt0_64.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/lib/crt0_64.S
> @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ relocation_return:
> * Set up final (full) environment
> */
> bl c_runtime_cpu_setup /* still call old routine */
> +#endif /* !CONFIG_SPL_BUILD */
>
> /* TODO: For SPL, call spl_relocate_stack_gd() to alloc stack relocation */
>
> @@ -130,6 +131,4 @@ clear_loop:
>
> /* NOTREACHED - board_init_r() does not return */
>
> -#endif /* !CONFIG_SPL_BUILD */
> -
> ENDPROC(_main)
> diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/spl.c b/arch/arm/lib/spl.c
> index e428868..b188834 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/lib/spl.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/lib/spl.c
> @@ -25,22 +25,22 @@ gd_t gdata __attribute__ ((section(".data")));
> #endif
>
> /*
> - * In the context of SPL, board_init_f must ensure that any clocks/etc for
> - * DDR are enabled, ensure that the stack pointer is valid, clear the BSS
> - * and call board_init_r. We provide this version by default but mark it
> - * as __weak to allow for platforms to do this in their own way if needed.
> + * In the context of SPL, board_init_f() prepares the hardware for execution
> + * from system RAM (DRAM, DDR...). As system RAM may not be available yet,
> + * board_init_f() must use the current GD to store any data which must be
> + * passed on to later stages. These data include the relocation destination,
> + * the future stack, and the future GD location. BSS is cleared after this
> + * function (and therefore must be accessible).
> + *
> + * We provide this version by default but mark it as __weak to allow for
> + * platforms to do this in their own way if needed.
Can you please add a comment pointing to the README also ("Board
Initialisation Flow")?
> */
> void __weak board_init_f(ulong dummy)
> {
> - /* Clear the BSS. */
> - memset(__bss_start, 0, __bss_end - __bss_start);
> -
> #ifndef CONFIG_SPL_DM
> /* TODO: Remove settings of the global data pointer here */
> gd = &gdata;
> #endif
> -
This is a good change, but if you are dropping the call to
board_init_r() then you should drop the above code also (along with
the gdata variable). I doubt any more is using it now as it has been a
while. So this weak function should be empty.
> - board_init_r(NULL, 0);
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 2.4.4
>
Regards,
Simon
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
