Hi Andreas,
On 07/14/2016 12:26 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 14.07.2016 um 05:51 schrieb Kever Yang:
Add support for rockchip rk33 series Soc like rk3368 and rk3399
Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.y...@rock-chips.com>
---
tools/rkcommon.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/tools/rkcommon.c b/tools/rkcommon.c
index 72621fd..9ec7eb2 100644
--- a/tools/rkcommon.c
+++ b/tools/rkcommon.c
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ struct spl_info {
static struct spl_info spl_infos[] = {
{ "rk3036", "RK30", 0x1000 },
{ "rk3288", "RK32", 0x8000 },
+ { "rk33xx", "RK33", 0x20000 },
Is xx really future-safe or would it be better to have two lines with
the exact model names as before?
Two information here, one is TAG 'RK33' which used by bootrom, they are
the same
for rk33 series SoC; another is SPL size which is depend on IRAM size,
this is
different for different SoC, rk3368 is smaller than rk3399.
I will use rk3399 first, but we may need to optimize the size limit
later for the tool,
because the image in Rockchip IDB format could be two parts, one like
SPL should
be run in IRAM, and another one like U-boot can be run in DRAM, the tool
only
consider the SPL part now.
Thanks,
- Kever
Cheers,
Andreas
};
static unsigned char rc4_key[16] = {
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
