Hi Stephen, 2016-06-02 19:00 GMT+02:00 Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org>: > On 05/23/2016 11:47 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> >> From: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com> >> >> The following changes are made to the clock API: >> * The concept of "clocks" and "peripheral clocks" are unified; each clock >> provider now implements a single set of clocks. This provides a simpler >> conceptual interface to clients, and better aligns with device tree >> clock bindings. >> * Clocks are now identified with a single "struct clk", rather than >> requiring clients to store the clock provider device and clock identity >> values separately. For simple clock consumers, this isolates clients >> from internal details of the clock API. >> * clk.h is split into clk_client.h and clk_uclass.h to make it obvious >> which parts are relevant to consumers and providers. This aligns with >> the recently added reset and mailbox APIs. >> * clk_ops .of_xlate(), .request(), and .free() are added so providers >> can customize these operations if needed. This also aligns with the >> recently added reset and mailbox APIs. >> * clk_disable() is added. >> * All users of the current clock APIs are updated. >> * Sandbox clock tests are updated to exercise clock lookup via DT, and >> clock enable/disable. >> * rkclk_get_clk() is removed and replaced with standard APIs. >> >> Buildman shows no clock-related errors for any board for which buildman >> can download a toolchain. >> >> test/py passes for sandbox (which invokes the dm clk test amongst >> others). > > > Simon, does this look good? >
could you rebase the patch to current mainline?. I couldn't apply it some days ago. Thanks. -- - Daniel _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
