Hello Scott,
Am 02.06.2016 um 02:09 schrieb Scott Wood:
On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 14:08 +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
@@ -59,6 +64,9 @@ int nand_register(int devnum, struct mtd_info *mtd)
* via the mtdcore infrastructure (e.g. ubi).
*/
add_mtd_device(mtd);
+#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_CONCAT
+ nand_devices_found++;
+#endif
#endif
[snip]
+ sprintf(c_mtd_name, "nand%d", nand_devices_found);
+ mtd = mtd_concat_create(nand_info, nand_devices_found,
+ c_mtd_name);
This assumes that there are no gaps in the NAND numbering (e.g. because some
device was optional or failed to init). It would be better to build an array
by scanning nand_info[] for non-NULL devices.
Yes, you are right ... Hmm... thinking about it ... this did exactly
my v1 ... I created such an array "mtd_nand_list" ... Ok, this
"mtd_nand_list" was a variable in file scope ... but as it is an array
of pointers, the mem footprint is not so big ... but if you find it
better to scan nand_info and create a new array on stack, I can do
this ... what way do you preffer?
bye,
Heiko
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
