On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 20:37 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Your patch numbering is really, really confusing. There is a patch > posted for the first time numbered as v2, another one as v3, and this > here is the second version of a patch which is still numbered v1.
Sorry if I confused you, that was not my intention at all, but I truly carefully numbered my patches. Every patch having a v > 1 was already posted here once before: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/67275 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/67197 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/67197 > I completely lost you here. > > I don;t understand if these patches are supposed to be part of a > series, or if they are independet of each other, or what else these > random vN additions might mean. Please eluciadate. If it would be a series, one would add something like [3/6] or such. So it is no series, just a few very simple patches. > Also please note that new versions of a patch should contain a > comment (below the "---" line) that describes what has been changed > compared to the old version, i. e. here something like: "v2: added > missing SoB line" or so. OK, this one is new for me, sorry. Unfortunately the one I looked at did not include any such history neither: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/67181 > Given this confusion, I will ignore the whole batch of 7 patches you > just sent. Please work on the other review comments, and then decide > how you want to post them - as series or independent patches. Assume > version numbering restarts from zero, as I really ignore this current > patch series. That's really sad. Cheers Marcel Ziswiler _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
