On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Dan Murphy <dmur...@ti.com> wrote: > Joe > > On 04/26/2016 04:44 PM, Joe Hershberger wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Joe Hershberger >> <joe.hershber...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Dan Murphy <dmur...@ti.com> wrote: >>>> Not all devices use the same internal delay or fifo depth. >>>> Add the ability to set the internal delay for rx or tx and the >>>> fifo depth via the devicetree. If the value is not set in the >>>> devicetree then set the delay to the default. >>>> >>>> If devicetree is not used then use the default defines within the >>>> driver. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmur...@ti.com> >>> Acked-by: Joe Hershberger <joe.hershber...@ni.com> >> This patch is not checkpatch.pl clean. Please resubmit. >> >> >> 610950.mbox:140: WARNING: line over 80 characters >> 610950.mbox:153: WARNING: line over 80 characters >> 610950.mbox:154: WARNING: line over 80 characters >> 610950.mbox:165: WARNING: line over 80 characters >> total: 0 errors, 4 warnings, 0 checks, 136 lines checked > > How do you want me to rebase these patches on the SGMII work from Michal on > the ti.c > or off of master? The patch I submitted was based off of the SGMII patchset.
I'm pulling in some of Michal's patches this release. Please reference which patches this depends on (patchwork links). > Need to know how you want to handle this as I see the SGMII code is not in > the base line > yet. If the patches you depend on are acceptable (no changes requested) then definitely base your changes on them, but point them out to me. Thanks, -Joe _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
