On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 01:39:26PM +0200, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 02:22:47PM +0300, Sami Kantoluoto wrote :
> > On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 01:08:27AM +0200, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 08:18:32PM +0300, Sami Kantoluoto wrote :
> > > > Fixed to parse CSD correctly on little endian processors as gcc orders
> > > > bitfields differently between big and little endian ones.
> > >
> > > Please also see this patch, which will fix those bugs as weel, while
> > > switching
> > > to the new GENRIC_MMC API:
> > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-August/059456.html
> > > I'd highly appreciate if you could test it, to get some feedback
> >
> > Thanks, I'll test when I get some time later this week but I think (by
> > reading the patch so I probably missed something) it won't solve the CSD
> > problem. The real reason of the "CSD problem" of course is that how the
> > mmc_csd structure is defined (host byte order not taken in account or
> > at least how gcc handles bitfields).
>
> drivers/mmc/mmc.c does not actually use the bitfield to parse the csd struct,
> and got fixed a while back to work no matter what endianness you're
> using, so it should solve it anyway.
Ok. Like I said (in other post) I was using the older u-boot version before
so I'm not too familiar with current one (and wasn't actually with the old
one either ;-). I'll try to do my homework better next time!
-sk
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
