On 02/23/2016 02:40 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
Provide user option to skip SPL signature verification for cases where
u-boot is build with SPL support but full U-Boot is also verified
without SPL.
If you want to support this feature please add env__spl_skipped = True
to your boardenv configuration file.
For example Xilinx Zynq is using this feature where the same U-Boot
binary is checked with SPL and without SPL(with FSBL).
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.si...@xilinx.com>
Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com>
Actually, NAK now...
diff --git a/test/py/u_boot_console_base.py b/test/py/u_boot_console_base.py
index d6502c6e64cb..b48d07261ff2 100644
--- a/test/py/u_boot_console_base.py
+++ b/test/py/u_boot_console_base.py
@@ -307,7 +307,9 @@ class ConsoleBase(object):
config_spl = bcfg.get('config_spl', 'n') == 'y'
config_spl_serial_support = bcfg.get('config_spl_serial_support',
'n') == 'y'
- if config_spl and config_spl_serial_support:
+ config_spl_skip = self.config.env.get('env_spl_skipped',
+ False)
I was talking about renaming the Python variable config_spl_skip, not
the boardenv_*.py variable env__spl_skipped.
The boardenv_*.py variable should be env__* to match existing variables
in the Python file.
I was requesting that the Python variable be named env_... not
config_... since it contains "board environment" not "config" data.
(BTW, you probably want to Cc Tom Rini on the next patch version since I
assume he'd apply this)
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
