Hi All:
It seems that the ECC correction is broken on the Linux with the 4xx
NDFC driver.
It uses the SMC order when reading the ECC code. 2-1-3
static int ndfc_calculate_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd,
const u_char *dat, u_char *ecc_code)
{
struct ndfc_controller *ndfc = &ndfc_ctrl;
uint32_t ecc;
uint8_t *p = (uint8_t *)&ecc;
wmb();
ecc = in_be32(ndfc->ndfcbase + NDFC_ECC);
/* The NDFC uses Smart Media (SMC) bytes order */
ecc_code[0] = p[2];
ecc_code[1] = p[1];
ecc_code[2] = p[3];
return 0;
}
However, when in the correction function, the byte address order is
again reverses
causing incorrect byte location.
* performace it does not make any difference
*/
if (eccsize_mult == 1)
byte_addr = (addressbits[b0] << 4) +
addressbits[b1];
>>>> The above really should be byte_addr = (addressbits[b1] << 4) +
addressbits[b0];
else
byte_addr = (addressbits[b2 & 0x3] << 8) +
(addressbits[b1] << 4) +
addressbits[b0];
bit_addr = addressbits[b2 >> 2];
/* flip the bit */
buf[byte_addr] ^= (1 << bit_addr);
printk(KERN_INFO "Corrected b[0] 0x%x b[1]0x%x\n", b0, b1);
printk(KERN_INFO "cal ecc b[0] 0x%x b[1]0x%x\n",
calc_ecc[0] , calc_ecc[1]);
printk(KERN_INFO "read ecc b[0] 0x%x b[1]0x%x\n",
read_ecc[0] , read_ecc[1]);
return 1;
I see other boards using SMC as well, can someone comment on the change
I am proposing.
Should I change the correction algorithm or the calculate function? If
the later is preferred
it would mean the change must be pushed in both U-Boot and Linux.
Feng Kan
AMCC Software
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
