On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 06:01:44PM +0100, Stefano Babic wrote: > On 24/01/2016 17:41, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Sunday, January 24, 2016 at 05:19:54 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 12:00:42PM +0800, Bin Meng wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Summary of 71 commits for 1100 boards (24 threads, 1 job per thread) > >>> 01: iocon / bamboo: Drop CONFIG_SYS_LONGHELP > >>> > >>> blackfin: + bf561-acvilon cm-bf561 blackstamp bf537-minotaur > >>> > >>> bct-brettl2 cm-bf527 bf506f-ezkit ip04 bf527-sdp pr1 bf527-ad7160-eval > >>> bf609-ezkit bf537-stamp bf527-ezkit-v2 cm-bf537e tcm-bf518 cm-bf537u > >>> bf527-ezkit cm-bf533 bf533-ezkit ibf-dsp561 bf537-pnav bf537-srv1 > >>> cm-bf548 bf538f-ezkit bf548-ezkit bf525-ucr2 blackvme tcm-bf537 > >>> bf533-stamp dnp5370 bf518f-ezbrd bf526-ezbrd bf561-ezkit br4 > >>> > >>> aarch64: + test > >>> > >>> avr32: + atngw100mkii grasshopper atstk1002 atngw100 > >>> > >>> sh: + sh7753evb sh7785lcr_32bit sh7785lcr > >>> > >>> arc: + arcangel4-be axs101 axs103 tb100 arcangel4 > >>> > >>> openrisc: + openrisc-generic > >>> > >>> powerpc: + TQM834x katmai > >>> > >>> arm: + mx28evk mx28evk_nand xfi3 bg0900 sansa_fuze_plus > >>> > >>> mx23evk m28evk sc_sps_1 mx28evk_spi apx4devkit mx23_olinuxino > >>> mx28evk_auart_console > > > > All of MXS is broken, why ? I don't recall any chances to MXS being done > > recently, so what happened ? > > I confirm this - I have not seen any breakage (but I built today with an > older gcc). Bing, can you output what you have seen for mxs boards ? > They looks ok to me.
They're good for me too, BUT! I suspect it comes down to the openssl-dev requirement on the host side which I also have thought Marek noted at some point as a problem anyhow due to license issues maybe? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
