On Sunday, January 24, 2016 at 06:18:23 PM, Stefano Babic wrote: > On 24/01/2016 18:11, Marek Vasut wrote: > > It is not clear when the wait_for_bit() will be applied, I am certain > > there will be another round for so. I do not want to wait for it and I > > don't see a reason why those patches should block this if the conversion > > can be done afterward. > > Just wait for a while - if it takes too much, I reconsider to apply this > first and factorize wait_for_bit() in a follow-up patch.
I have waited for over a month and I fail to see a reason why patches which will be applied at uncertain point in the future shall block this patchset. The wait_for_bit() can be removed by a subsequent patch, it is already pulled out explicitly in the code, so I don't see a problem with applying this. Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
