On 15.01.16 14:52, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 01:26:42AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 26.12.15 19:33, Leif Lindholm wrote:
>>>> + .reset_system = (void *)&efi_unimplemented,
>>>
>>> "The ResetSystem() function does not return."
>>
>> Hrm, I think returning EFI_UNSUPPORTED is still better than while(1) {
>> }. With the return an OS at least has the chance to fix things up itself.
>
> I'm not saying it isn't better, I'm saying it's not compliant - there
> is no valid return value. I would prefer simply having the pointer set
> to NULL.
Is a NULL function pointer valid here?
Alex
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
