Hi Simon, On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 6:14 AM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: >> Hi Bin, >> >> On 13 December 2015 at 23:05, Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi Simon, >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: >>>> It seems likely that at some point we will want a generic interrupt uclass. >>>> But this is a big undertaking as it involves unifying code across multiple >>>> architectures. >>>> >>>> As a first step, create a simple IRQ uclass and a driver for x86. This can >>>> be generalised later as required. >>>> >>>> Adjust pirq_init() to probe this driver, which has the effect of creating >>>> routing tables and setting up the interrupt routing. This is a start >>>> towards making interrupts fit better with driver model. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> >>>> --- >>>> >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> >>> >>> I will test this series when all previous DM changes are applied. >> >> Do you mean the series that I just pushed to dm/next. or something else? >> > > Yes, I mean all previous DM changes as I suspect this series has some > dependency on previous series. I will apply this series on top of > dm/next and test there.
patch#4, patch#5 does not apply on top of dm/next. I guess there are some other dependencies? Regards, Bin _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
