On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 12:59:48 AM, Chin Liang See wrote: > On Sat, 2015-12-12 at 16:36 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Saturday, December 12, 2015 at 07:30:46 AM, Chin Liang See wrote: > [...] > > > > > Can you share the final layout before you roll out patches ? > > > > > > Sure, plan to do so but need to away from desk just now. > > > > > > Here is the old layout > > > 256k(spl) > > > 64k(env) > > > 64k(dtb) > > > 256k(boot) > > > 16m(kernel) > > > 16m(rootfs) > > > > > > The new one would like this > > > 256k(spl) > > > > I'd say you should just call this u-boot, see above for the > > rationale. > > > > > 256k(env) > > > 15872k(boot) > > > 16m(rootfs) > > > > > > The boot partition can be used as ubi part or raw partition. > > > It contains the linux dtb, u-boot and linux images. > > > > Is that an UBIFS partition ? If so, why don't you just use two UBI > > volumes ? > > For backward compatibility, it can be raw if user want to stick with > old way.
If you're breaking the partitioning layout anyway, you don't have to care about the "old way", right ? Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
