On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 10:07:44PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > There are two numbering schemes for the RPi revision values; old and new > scheme. The values within each scheme overlap. Hence, it doesn't make > sense to have absolute/global names for the revision IDs. Get rid of the > names and just use the raw revision/type values to set up the array of > per-revision data. > > This change makes most sense when coupled with the next change. However, > it's split out so that the mechanical cut/paste is separate from the > logic changes for easier review and problem bisection. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org>
Applied to u-boot/master, thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
