Hi Stefan, On 26 November 2015 at 18:02, Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de> wrote: > Hi Jagan, > > > On 26.11.2015 13:24, Jagan Teki wrote: >> >> On 26 November 2015 at 17:33, Jagan Teki <jt...@openedev.com> wrote: >>> >>> This series is combination of mtd and sf tunning stuff in previous >>> version patches.[1][2] >>> >>> This is whole patch series for add mtd support to spi-flash >>> framework and related stuff. >>> >>> The idea is to introduce the spi-nor flash framework which >>> similar to Linux with driver-model support. >>> >>> Detail changes: >>> - drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c: spi-flash to spi drivers interface(dm and >>> non-dm) >>> - drivers/mtd/spi/sf_ops.c: Core spi-flash functionalities. >>> - spi_flash ops and dm_spi_ops are not needed as flash opertaion are >>> common for dm and non-dm via MTD >>> >>> Changes in v7: >>> - Rebase to master >>> - Added MTD core support to dataflash >>> - Few patch bisectable separations >>> >>> Changes in v6, v5, v4, v3, v2: >>> - One patch bisectable separation >>> - Rebase to master >>> - added newly mtd stuff patches. >>> >>> Testing: >>> $ git clone git://git.denx.de/u-boot-spi.git >>> $ cd u-boot-spi >>> $ git checkout -b spi-nor-mtd origin/next-spi-nor-mtd >>> >>> [1] >>> http://u-boot.10912.n7.nabble.com/PATCH-v6-00-23-sf-MTD-support-td233769.html >>> [2] http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2015-October/229857.html >>> >>> thanks! >>> Jagan. >>> >>> Jagan Teki (34): >>> sf: spi_flash_validate_params => spi_flash_scan >>> sf: Move spi_flash_scan code to sf_ops >>> sf: Move read_id code to sf_ops >>> sf: probe: Code cleanup >>> sf: Use static for file-scope functions >>> sf: Fix Makefile >>> sf: Use simple name for register access functions >>> sf: Use flash function pointers in dm_spi_flash_ops >>> sf: Flash power up read-only based on idcode0 >>> sf: Use static for file-scope functions >>> sf: Remove unneeded header includes >>> sf: probe: Use spi_flash_scan in dm-spi-flash >>> sf: Re-factorize spi_flash_probe_tail code >>> dm-sf: Re-factorize spi_flash_std_probe code >>> zynq: Enable CONFIG_SPL_MTD_SUPPORT >>> sf: Add MTD support to spi_flash >>> sf: Use mtd_info ops instead of spi_flash ops >>> cmd_sf: Use mtd->size instead of flash->size >>> sf: Use mtd->erasesize instead of flash->erase_size >>> dm-sf: use mtd_ops, drop dm_spi_flash_ops >>> sf: Use MTD lock operations >>> sf: Add MTD support for non-dm spi_flash interface >>> sf: probe: Minor cleanup >>> sf: Drop SNOR_F_SST_WR flash->flags >>> sf: Remove unneeded SST_BP and SST_WP >>> sf: ops: Fix missing break on spansion read_bar >>> sf: Drop SPI_FLASH_MTD driver >>> configs: Remove CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_MTD >>> sf: dataflash: Remove unneeded spi data >>> sf: dataflash: Move flash id detection into jedec_probe >>> sf: dataflash: Fix add_dataflash return logic >>> sf: dataflash: Add MTD core support >>> sf: dataflash: Rename sf_dataflash.c to mtd_dataflash.c >>> mtd: dataflash: Minor cleanups >> >> >> Tested whole series except 'sf prot' and dataflash. >> >> Tested-by: Jagan Teki <jt...@openedev.com> > > > Thanks. > > BTW: Is this series also tested on a board with SPL_DM and > DM_SPI and DM_SPI_FLASH enabled? By loading in SPL the main > U-Boot image via SPI NOR flash?
Don't know the reason yet SPL is not working with my microzed board(even with MMC), so I took the fsbl instead of SPL. The combination I have verified with both dm and non-dm cases on u-boot. Michal, Can you verify the SPI_SPL flow as well. > I'm asking since I'm currently struggling to get this working > on MVEBU. And am experiencing problems with the DM SPI > bus and device probing. Without SPL_DM this is working just > fine. OK, means you're trying for SPI_SPL with DM is it? what kind of issue? is it failed to probe device or something? I will verify the same and let you know. thanks! -- Jagan | openedev. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
