Hi Fabio, On 10 November 2015 at 14:23, Fabio Estevam <feste...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Then I wonder why malloc() is failing? Is it because there is too much > > In the example I sent I only allocate 64 bytes. malloc() does fail > even if I decrease this number. > >> being allocated, or is the simple malloc region not being set up >> correctly? > > This puzzles me too. I am not very familiar with this code and I don't > know the reason why reverting 5ba534d247d41 'fixes' the problem.
Are you able to check what is happening in malloc_simple()? It is a really simple function. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot