Hi Jagan,
On 29 October 2015 at 07:11, Jagan Teki <jt...@openedev.com> wrote:
> Hi Heiko,
>
> On 29 October 2015 at 12:05, Heiko Schocher <h...@denx.de> wrote:
>> Hello Jagan,
>>
>> Am 12.10.2015 um 21:54 schrieb Jagan Teki:
>>>
>>> Since mtd_info ops got introduced, just drop the unneeded
>>> dm_spi_flash operations.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jt...@openedev.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/mtd/spi/sf-uclass.c | 16 --------
>>> drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c | 30 ---------------
>>> include/spi_flash.h | 91
>>> +++++++--------------------------------------
>>> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 123 deletions(-)
>>
>>
>> Does this not break: drivers/mtd/spi/sf-uclass.c ?
>
> This wouldn't break the dm because mtd_info ops are common to dm or
> non-dm spi-flash which I tuned in this series[1] That means the tuned
> sf series is prior to this MTD.
>
>>
>> added simon to cc.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf-uclass.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf-uclass.c
>>> index 350e21a..5cdbd1b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf-uclass.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf-uclass.c
>>> @@ -11,22 +11,6 @@
>>> #include <dm/device-internal.h>
>>> #include "sf_internal.h"
>>>
>>> -int spi_flash_read_dm(struct udevice *dev, u32 offset, size_t len, void
>>> *buf)
>>> -{
>>> - return sf_get_ops(dev)->read(dev, offset, len, buf);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -int spi_flash_write_dm(struct udevice *dev, u32 offset, size_t len,
>>> - const void *buf)
>>> -{
>>> - return sf_get_ops(dev)->write(dev, offset, len, buf);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -int spi_flash_erase_dm(struct udevice *dev, u32 offset, size_t len)
>>> -{
>>> - return sf_get_ops(dev)->erase(dev, offset, len);
>>> -}
>>> -
These are the functions that we should keep. It is the the ones that
don't take a struct udevice parameter which should be removed...
Regards,
Simon
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
