Hi Jagan,
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Jagan Teki <jt...@openedev.com> wrote:
>> +static int do_spi_protect(int argc, char * const argv[])
>> +{
>> + int ret = 0;
>> + loff_t start, len;
>> + bool prot = false;
>> +
>> + if (argc != 4)
>> + return -1;
>> +
>> + if (!str2off(argv[2], &start)) {
>> + puts("start sector is not a valid number\n");
>> + return 1;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!str2off(argv[3], &len)) {
>> + puts("len is not a valid number\n");
>> + return 1;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (strcmp(argv[1], "lock") == 0)
>> + prot = true;
>> + else if (strcmp(argv[1], "unlock") == 0)
>> + prot = false;
>> + else
>
> Don't we have is_locked command from user? may be we can all this one as well.
Sorry, I did not understand the suggestion here.
Looks like you are happy with patches 1 to 15 of this series.
Could you please apply patches 1 to 15 and then I rework only this last one?
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
