Hello Marek, On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 12:00:09 +0100, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: > On Sunday, October 25, 2015 at 05:44:47 AM, Siarhei Siamashka wrote: > > This is necessary to distinguish between the "dfu-util --detach" and > > the "dfu-util --reset" requests. > > > > The default weak implementation of dfu_usb_get_reset() unconditionally > > reboots the device, but we want to be able to continue the boot.scr > > execution after writing the kernel, fdt and ramdisk to RAM via DFU. > > > > Signed-off-by: Siarhei Siamashka <siarhei.siamas...@gmail.com> > > --- > > drivers/usb/musb-new/sunxi.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb-new/sunxi.c b/drivers/usb/musb-new/sunxi.c > > index a146c08..5eb8d19 100644 > > --- a/drivers/usb/musb-new/sunxi.c > > +++ b/drivers/usb/musb-new/sunxi.c > > @@ -166,6 +166,17 @@ static void USBC_ConfigFIFO_Base(void) > > } > > > > /************************************************************************* > > ***** + * Needed for the DFU polling magic > > + > > ************************************************************************** > > ****/ + > > +static u8 last_int_usb; > > + > > +bool dfu_usb_get_reset(void) > > +{ > > + return !!(last_int_usb & MUSB_INTR_RESET); > > The !! is not needed.
Except if you want to be sure that you return 0 or 1 rather than 0 or (1 << something). > [...] > > Best regards, > Marek Vasut Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot