> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 2:39 AM
> To: Aggrwal Poonam-B10812
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] Removed CONFIG_NUM_CPUS for
> 85xx and 86xx Freescale processors.
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 04:17:43PM +0530, Poonam Aggrwal wrote:
> > +int cpu_numcores() {
> > + struct cpu_type *cpu;
> > + cpu = gd->cpu;
> > + return cpu->num_cores;
> > +}
>
> Shouldn't this check CONFIG_MP and return 1 if not set?
> Otherwise you get a weird mix of MP and UP.
>
> The checks to warn the user of a UP u-boot on an MP chip
> would have to reference cpu->num_cores directly, or we could
> add a hard_cpu_numcores(), or similar.
This function's intent is to just return the number of cores that the
system has.
This is more of kind of probong the actual hardware.
The CONFIG_MP flag will take care of all the multicore stuff in u-boot.
>
> -Scott
>
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
