Dear Luigi Mantellini, In message <b73e93990907271302g31b398d3qf4acf29d1af13...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: > I have a stupid question: why the depend uses CPPFLAGS instead instead CFLAGS?
Because depend runs "$(CC) -M", i. e. just the preprocessor, so any additional flags needed for later compiler passes don't matter anyway. > can this patch be acceptable? Or there is something that I don't understand? > > diff --git a/rules.mk b/rules.mk > index 6f999dd..998dd4e 100644 > --- a/rules.mk > +++ b/rules.mk > @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ $(obj).depend: $(src)Makefile > $(TOPDIR)/config.mk $(SRCS) > @rm -f $@ > @for f in $(SRCS); do \ > g=`basename $$f | sed -e 's/\(.*\)\.\w/\1.o/'`; \ > - $(CC) -M $(HOSTCFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) -MQ > $(obj)$$g $$f >> $@ ; \ > + $(CC) -M $(HOSTCFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) > -MQ $(obj)$$g $$f >> $@ ; \ > done Looks wrong to me. > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Mike Frysinger<vap...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > On Monday 27 July 2009 15:12:11 Luigi Mantellini wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Mike Frysinger<vap...@gentoo.org> wrote: ... Arghhh. Mike already told you before: please do not top post / full quote. Please read http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html to understand what this means. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de A princess should not be afraid -- not with a brave knight to protect her. -- McCoy, "Shore Leave", stardate 3025.3 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
