Hi Simon,
On 10/12/2015 05:47 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
I don't see any problem with this in general, although the point with
CFI is that you are really implementing the uclass, as there will not
going to be any drivers (as I understand it).
Looking at SPI flash, it does have an API (read, write, erase). Could
CFI use the same API? That might mean that we could unify the two and
share a uclass.
One approach may be to use a name like UCLASS_FLASH, and add some
operations to it. Then we can say that we have a real uclass. The
operations could come in a separate flash perhaps.
Great. It has been my first choice to have a unified flash uclass.
Best regards,
Thomas
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
