Hi George, On 7 October 2015 at 16:29, George McCollister <george.mccollis...@gmail.com> wrote: > Instead of having x86-pinctrl work separately from ich6-gpio have it > work underneath ich6-gpio. This removes redundant configuration and will > allow the addition of shared bank settings in future commits. > > Signed-off-by: George McCollister <george.mccollis...@gmail.com> > --- > arch/x86/dts/minnowmax.dts | 96 +++++++++--------- > arch/x86/include/asm/gpio.h | 1 - > board/intel/minnowmax/minnowmax.c | 9 +- > doc/device-tree-bindings/gpio/intel,ich6-gpio.txt | 14 +++ > .../gpio/intel,x86-pinctrl.txt | 17 ++-- > drivers/gpio/intel_ich6_gpio.c | 107 > ++++++++------------- > 6 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 126 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 doc/device-tree-bindings/gpio/intel,ich6-gpio.txt
Conceptually pinmux and GPIO are different concepts. What is the need to make pinctrl a subset of GPIO? In some ways the opposite would make more sense. Perhaps instead we should have a pinctrl driver? Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
