On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 09:31:52AM +1000, Julian Calaby wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 1:39 AM, Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 09/18/2015 11:39 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:17:00AM -0400, Hans de Goede wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> On 09/18/2015 11:02 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 02:06:17PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> The R8 is very close to the A13, but it still has a few differences, > >>>>> notably a composite output, which the A13 lacks. > >>>>> > >>>>> Add a DTSI based on the A13's to hold those differences. > >>>>> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.rip...@free-electrons.com> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Other than needing to use SPDX tags instead: > >>>> Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> > >>> > >>> > >>> This is in essence a partial sync with the kernel tree wrt the dts > >>> files, so no SPDX tags. > >> > >> > >> Really? I'd have sworn that we were doing that even on kernel files, > > > > > > I don't know. I'm fine either way, but I do not think we should be > > adding SPDX tags on the u-boot side only for these files, since those > > will just get overwritten (removed) on the next sync with the kernel. > > Would it make sense to just add them kernel side?
No because we use them instead of the big boiler-plate version of the license. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
