On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 09:35:32 AM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On 19 August 2015 at 04:28, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, August 19, 2015 at 12:36:40 AM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> >> On 19 August 2015 at 03:33, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote:
> >> > On Monday, August 17, 2015 at 12:32:54 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> >> >> This patch adds flag status register reading support to
> >> >> spi_flash_cmd_wait_ready.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jt...@openedev.com>
> >> >> Cc: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
> >> >> Cc: Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de>
> >> >> Cc: Michal Simek <michal.si...@xilinx.com>
> >> >> Cc: Siva Durga Prasad Paladugu <siva...@xilinx.com>
> >> >> Cc: Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de>
> >> >> Cc: Tom Warren <twar...@nvidia.com>
> >> >> Cc: Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com>
> >> >> Cc: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com>
> >> >> Cc: Hou Zhiqiang <b48...@freescale.com>
> >> >> Tested-by: Jagan Teki <jt...@openedev.com>
> >> >> ---
> >> >>
> >> >> drivers/mtd/spi/sf_internal.h | 1 +
> >> >> drivers/mtd/spi/sf_ops.c | 66
> >> >>
> >> >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >> >> drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c
> >> >>
> >> >> | 4 +--
> >> >>
> >> >> include/spi_flash.h | 2 --
> >> >> 4 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >> >>
> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_internal.h
> >> >> b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_internal.h index e97c716..4ecfd0c 100644
> >> >> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_internal.h
> >> >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_internal.h
> >> >> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ enum {
> >> >>
> >> >> enum spi_nor_option_flags {
> >> >>
> >> >> SNOR_F_SST_WR = (1 << 0),
> >> >>
> >> >> + SNOR_F_USE_FSR = (1 << 1),
> >> >>
> >> >> };
> >> >>
> >> >> #define SPI_FLASH_3B_ADDR_LEN 3
> >> >>
> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_ops.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_ops.c
> >> >> index 7d7c264..a5487ad 100644
> >> >> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_ops.c
> >> >> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_ops.c
> >> >> @@ -40,6 +40,21 @@ int spi_flash_cmd_read_status(struct spi_flash
> >> >> *flash, u8 *rs) return 0;
> >> >>
> >> >> }
> >> >>
> >> >> +static int read_fsr(struct spi_flash *flash, u8 *fsr)
> >> >> +{
> >> >> + int ret;
> >> >> + u8 cmd;
> >> >> +
> >> >> + cmd = CMD_FLAG_STATUS;
> >> >> + ret = spi_flash_read_common(flash, &cmd, 1, fsr, 1);
> >> >> + if (ret < 0) {
> >> >> + debug("SF: fail to read flag status register\n");
> >> >> + return ret;
> >> >> + }
> >> >> +
> >> >> + return 0;
> >> >> +}
> >> >> +
> >> >>
> >> >> int spi_flash_cmd_write_status(struct spi_flash *flash, u8 ws)
> >> >> {
> >> >>
> >> >> u8 cmd;
> >> >>
> >> >> @@ -138,24 +153,63 @@ static void spi_flash_dual_flash(struct
> >> >> spi_flash *flash, u32 *addr) }
> >> >>
> >> >> #endif
> >> >>
> >> >> +static inline int spi_flash_sr_ready(struct spi_flash *flash)
> >> >> +{
> >> >> + u8 sr;
> >> >> + int ret;
> >> >> +
> >> >> + ret = spi_flash_cmd_read_status(flash, &sr);
> >> >> + if (ret < 0)
> >> >> + return ret;
> >> >> +
> >> >> + if (sr < 0)
> >> >
> >> > Have you ever seen u8 value that's < 0 ? :-)
> >>
> >> Yes, over looked, It's been fixed on next patches as well.
> >
> > Please don't apply broken code, fix this and repost.
>
> I don't know what your talking about, there is patch already submitted
> with this fix and even you're CCed [1]
>
> [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/508166/
I am talking about not applying patches which are known to be defective.
If you plan to apply this particular patch, make sure to fix it, repost
it and then apply this. Do NOT apply a patch which is broken only to apply
another patch which repairs the breakage, that's just nonsense.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
