>> > > I would think should be CONFIG_DRIVERS_PATA_BFIN >> > >> > I dosagree, the "DRIVERS" part is just added line noise. >> >> It's a name space - making sure it is differentiated from an option. > > Yeah, and we end up with variable names that cannot be used any more > because they exceed the maximum line length.
What about "DRV" or even "D" if you insist? CONFIG_D_I2C_SOFT ? I personally find the config files pretty unreadable. Options that enable a driver should be different from those that select a behaviour, in my opinion. While people responsible for their board know all the stuff they wrote, but when someone undergoes a more general code change several or all config files must be checked. A driver namespace would help, in my opionion. /alessandro _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
