Hi Linus,
On 11 August 2015 at 07:00, Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> This binding differs from that of Linux. Update it and change existing
>> users.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
> (...)
>> doc/device-tree-bindings/serial/pl01x.txt | 55
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>
> So why does U-Boot have its own copy of any bindings at all?
>
> This is forking the ontology of who gets to define bindings I fear.
> It's a bit like have two bibles both claiming to be the word of god.
> (OK maybe a hyperbolic statement, but you see what I mean.)
>
> Can't we just have the bindings in the Linux kernel tree please?
Is there any plan to move them out of Linux and put them in a separate place?
We should make an effort to sync the device tree files with Linux periodically.
I quite like having the bindings in U-Boot since it makes people think
about what they are adding. Are you worried that the bindings in
U-Boot might evolve separately? Certainly there has been some of that.
However I recently sent a series to add a few things for Raspberry Pi
("arm: rpi: Device tree modifications for U-Boot") and I don't yet see
a willingness to add what some see as 'U-Boot things' to the binding.
How do we address that?
Regards,
Simon
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
